Editing
Daniel:Notebook/ComboLock/2016-8-25
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=Positive Control Amplicon Test (Started [[Daniel:Notebook/ComboLock/2016-8-18|8/18/2016]])= ==Preliminary Sequencing Results== From looking at the results from the four sample index lanes. Each of the indexes corresponds to an experiment, I've attached the expected table below. {| class="wikitable" <hiddentext>generated with [[:de:Wikipedia:Helferlein/VBA-Macro for EXCEL tableconversion]] V1.8</hiddentext> |- style="background-color:#FCD5B4;font-size:12pt;font-weight:bold" align="center" | width="49" height="31" | Sample No | width="180" | Sample Name | width="95" | Index | width="100" | Expected Product |- style="font-size:12pt" | align="center" height="15" valign="bottom" | 1 | valign="bottom" | Amp1 Test | align="center" valign="bottom" | 10 | align="center" valign="bottom" | Amp1 |- style="background-color:#D9D9D9;font-size:12pt" | align="center" height="15" valign="bottom" | 2 | valign="bottom" | Amp3 Test | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 11 | align="center" valign="bottom" | Amp3 |- style="font-size:12pt" | align="center" height="15" valign="bottom" | 3 | valign="bottom" | LatchX2 Specificity | align="center" valign="bottom" | 12 | align="center" valign="bottom" | Amp1 |- style="background-color:#D9D9D9;font-size:12pt" | align="center" height="15" valign="bottom" | 4 | valign="bottom" | LatchX3 Specificity | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 13 | align="center" valign="bottom" | Amp3 |} Also below is the gel image from size selection. Note that index 11 didn't have any product of the right size, so I don't expect any results from that column. <gallery perrow=2 heights=200px widths=200px> File:2016-08-20-PosConTest-SizeSelect.png|Before Image File:2016-08-20-PosConTest-SizeSelect-After.png|After Image </gallery> Now we can look at the results. In order to get these I used grep on the barcodes that are specific to each of the three positive control pieces (C1, C2 and C3). I grepped each barcode alone and in pairs with each other. Note that C1-C2 and C3-C2 are the expected products, C1-C3 should never exist. {| class="wikitable" <hiddentext>generated with [[:de:Wikipedia:Helferlein/VBA-Macro for EXCEL tableconversion]] V1.8</hiddentext> |- style="background-color:#FCD5B4;font-size:12pt;font-weight:bold" align="center" | width="180" height="37" | Name | width="160" | Barcode Sequence | width="65" | Index 10 | width="65" | Index 11 | width="65" | Index 12 | width="65" | Index 13 |- style="font-size:12pt" | height="15" valign="bottom" | Latch6 BC (C3) | valign="bottom" | GTTGGCAG | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 4 | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 95 | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 7658 | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 11266 |- style="background-color:#D9D9D9;font-size:12pt" | height="15" valign="bottom" | Latch8 BC RC (C1) | valign="bottom" | TACAAATA | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 1140 | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 187 | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 14963 | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 26222 |- style="font-size:12pt" | height="15" valign="bottom" | Latch9 BC RC (C2) | valign="bottom" | GTAGGCGC | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 1069 | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 77 | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 22059 | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 37200 |- style="background-color:#D9D9D9;font-size:12pt" | height="15" valign="bottom" | Intersect L8-L9 (C1-C2) | valign="bottom" | TACAAATA,GTAGGCGC | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 1025 | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0 | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 14047 | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 25016 |- style="font-size:12pt" | height="15" valign="bottom" | Intersect (C3-C2) | valign="bottom" | GTTGGCAG,GTAGGCGC | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0 | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 2 | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 7163 | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 10759 |- style="background-color:#D9D9D9;font-size:12pt" | height="15" valign="bottom" | Intersect (C1-C3) | valign="bottom" | GTTGGCAG,TACAAATA | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0 | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0 | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0 | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0 |- style="font-size:12pt" | height="15" valign="bottom" | Percent C2 Reads from Amplicons | align="center" valign="bottom" | | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 95.884 | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 2.597 | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 96.151 | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 96.169 |- style="background-color:#D9D9D9;font-size:12pt" | height="15" valign="bottom" | Perecent On Target | align="center" valign="bottom" | | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 100 | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0 | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 66.2 | align="center" align="center" valign="bottom" | 30.1 |} The results are quite encouraging, as in the lane where only C1-C2 (PCAmp1) was added, only C1-C2 shows up. In the two mixed lanes, however, we get reads from both fragments. Because of this, I am investigating further. The "Flip" samples from Positive Control Amplicon Test 2 test the wrong latch-template combination without the other latch or template (e.g. tests LatchX3 and C1-C2). Therefore, sequencing them will give me a better idea of what is going on. I think that the latch is able to bind even when it is wrong. This is because the 18bp sequences flanking each latch are the same (they are the adapter sequences). If that is the case, I should see sequencing results that match the latch, not the padlock. One additional note. Extracting only the barcodes is not proof enough that the barcodes are in the right place. So I manually aligned three reads. They are all perfect. [[Media:MiSeq20160822-Analysis.pdf|Alignment Table]] [[Category:ComboLock]] [[Category:20160822]] [[Category:20160818]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ZhangLabWiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ZhangLabWiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main Page
Current events
Recent changes
Random page
Investigators
Matt Cai
Song Chen
Eric Chu
Dinh Diep
Elizabeth Duong
Shicheng Guo
Alan Fung
Daniel Jacobsen
Blue Lake
Huy Lam
Alice Li
Andrew Richards
Brandon Sos
Chris Wei
Yan Wu
Kun Zhang
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information