AlanFung:LabNotes/CTCF/2010-3-24: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>Alan6017518 |
>Alan6017518 |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*setup: 100ng,50ng, 25ng, 10ng, 5ng and -ve control | *setup: 100ng,50ng, 25ng, 10ng, 5ng and -ve control | ||
==End Repair== | ==End Repair== | ||
*Dilute 10x for 25,10 and 5ng | |||
{| {{table}} | {| {{table}} | ||
| ||100ng||50ng||25ng||10ng||5ng||-ve | | ||100ng||50ng||25ng||10ng||5ng||-ve |
Revision as of 21:07, 24 March 2010
Quantification of Jurkat PCR Product
Nanodrop: 250.7ng/ul Qubit: 48.4ng/ul Gel Quant: 18.95ng/ul
File:ZhangLab 2 2010-03-24 11hr 35min.jpg
- I think both the nanaodrop and gel quantification are biased, for the nanaodrop it gives out an extremely high amount of concentration, this usually happens because nanaodrop cannot differentiate between any contamination. As for the gel image the band at 100bp is much stronger than the ladder band which hits that the concentration is higher than 18.95ng/ul. In this case I would go with the qubit quantification.
Library Prep with new Jurkat PCR product
- Concentration:48.4ng/ul
- BP:100BP
- setup: 100ng,50ng, 25ng, 10ng, 5ng and -ve control
End Repair
- Dilute 10x for 25,10 and 5ng
100ng | 50ng | 25ng | 10ng | 5ng | -ve | |
DNA | 2.07 | 1.03 | 5.17 | 2.07 | 1.03 | 0 |
End Repair Buffer | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
End Repair Enzyme mix | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
ddH2o | 82.93 | 83.97 | 79.83 | 82.93 | 83.97 | 85 |
Total Volume | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |