Chris:LabNotes/Microbiome/2010-10-17: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>Cjwei (Created page with '=FISH with "Alexa 488 EBU 338 9/03/10 probe" on ETOH E. coli and ETOH/RLV MB ==Background== *Previously, we tested PU on E. coli and MB on 10/13 but only could get the universal …') |
>Cjwei No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=FISH with "Alexa 488 EBU 338 9/03/10 probe" on ETOH E. coli and ETOH/RLV MB | =FISH with "Alexa 488 EBU 338 9/03/10 probe" on ETOH E. coli and ETOH/RLV MB= | ||
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
*Previously, we tested PU on E. coli and MB on 10/13 but only could get the universal probe to work on E. coli -> wanted to move forward to try to get probe to work on MB | *Previously, we tested PU on E. coli and MB on 10/13 but only could get the universal probe to work on E. coli -> wanted to move forward to try to get probe to work on MB | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
ETOH MB (10/14) | ETOH MB (10/14) | ||
RLV MB (10/14) | RLV MB (10/14) | ||
*Rxn's: | |||
1=ETOH E. coli PU | |||
2=ETOH E. coli PN | |||
3=ETOH MB PU | |||
4=ETOH MB PN | |||
5=RLV MB PU | |||
6=RLV MB PN | |||
==Procedure== | ==Procedure== | ||
*Prepared 2M NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 2M Tris (was stored in the 1.5ml tube that was previously tested for correct pH), 0.5 EDTA, and PBS solutions (used no UV/filter PBS because not sorting) | *Prepared 2M NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 2M Tris (was stored in the 1.5ml tube that was previously tested for correct pH), 0.5 EDTA, and PBS solutions (used no UV/filter PBS because not sorting) | ||
**Vortex each reagent before use | **Vortex each reagent before use | ||
Line 59: | Line 65: | ||
**After last wash, still substantial pallet so can still see it clearly in tube | **After last wash, still substantial pallet so can still see it clearly in tube | ||
*Resuspend the pellet with 100uL PBS and stored in 4C fridge | *Resuspend the pellet with 100uL PBS and stored in 4C fridge | ||
==Results== | |||
===Microscope Images=== | |||
**ETOH MB PU (124/248) | |||
[[File:10_17_2010_3_Chris.jpg|500px]] | |||
**RLV MB PU (124/248) | |||
[[File:10_17_2010_5_Chris.jpg|500px]] | |||
Results based on microscope images show that RLV-fixed mouse bacteria showed slightly better fluorescence than ETOH-fixed | |||
===Flow Cytometry Results=== | |||
*ETOH E. coli PN (used to calibrate flow cytometer PMT for ETOH E. coli) | |||
[[File:002.jpg|500px]] | |||
*ETOH E. coli PU | |||
[[File:004.jpg|500px]] | |||
*ETOH MB PN (used to calibrate flow cytometer PMT for ETOH MB) | |||
[[File:003.jpg|500px]] | |||
*ETOH MB PU | |||
[[File:006.jpg|500px]] | |||
*RLV MB PN (used to calibrate flow cytometer PMT for RLV MB) | |||
[[File:10_17_2010_001.jpg|500px]] | |||
*RLV MB PU | |||
[[File:005.jpg|500px]] | |||
===Overall Conclusions=== | |||
*E. coli PU doesn't seem like it's working, but still move on because successful cultured mouse gut bacteria hybridization | |||
*Based on both microscope and flow cytometry results, RLV-fixed MB has higher signal than ETOH-fixed MB |
Latest revision as of 20:20, 22 October 2010
FISH with "Alexa 488 EBU 338 9/03/10 probe" on ETOH E. coli and ETOH/RLV MB[edit]
Background[edit]
- Previously, we tested PU on E. coli and MB on 10/13 but only could get the universal probe to work on E. coli -> wanted to move forward to try to get probe to work on MB
- This time, we tested a new MB template made on 10/14, and also changed the dilution from 1/2 to 1/5
- Probe: "Alexa 488 EBU 338 9/03/10"
- Template:
ETOH E. coli (7/23) -> new E. coli cultured sample ETOH MB (10/14) RLV MB (10/14)
- Rxn's:
1=ETOH E. coli PU 2=ETOH E. coli PN 3=ETOH MB PU 4=ETOH MB PN 5=RLV MB PU 6=RLV MB PN
Procedure[edit]
- Prepared 2M NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 2M Tris (was stored in the 1.5ml tube that was previously tested for correct pH), 0.5 EDTA, and PBS solutions (used no UV/filter PBS because not sorting)
- Vortex each reagent before use
- Thaw the pre-fixed bacteria E. coli/MB samples (stored in -80C)
- Used ETOH E. coli (7/23) -> no dilution because already decreased template by half during fixation
- Used ETOH/RLV-fixed MB (10/14/2010) -> 1/5 dilution for MB
- Pellet the samples by 10,000xg, 5min at RT. Remove the supernatant.
- Wash palettes with 500ul 1xPBS twice (w/ 10,000xg, 5min centrifuge after each wash)
- After last washing, re-centrifuge the pellet again to remove the supernatant completely (10,000xg, 1min).
- Pre-warm the incubator to 46C
Prepare H-buffer in foil wraped, clear low-binding 1.5-ml tube (didn't prepare H-buffer until every washing was done) Because same probe, prepared H-buffer for each probe rxn's separately 1 rxn --------------------------------------- H2O 86 = used nuclease-free water 2M NaCl 90 0.1% SDS 20 2M Tris 2 Probe(1000ng/uL) 2 -------------------------------------- 200 repeat pipette mix 5x
- Resuspend the pellet (in 1.5mL tubes) with 200uL H-buffer. Make sure to break up pellet thoroughly for complete hybridization.
- Vortex each sample for 5sec
- Incubate at mixture at 46C for 1hr 30min (No shaking).
Prepare W-buffer in a 1.5-mL clear low-binding tube 1rxn ----------------------------- H2O 395 0.1% SDS 50 2M NaCl 45 2M Tris 5 0.5M EDTA 5 ----------------------------- 500
- Adjust to incubator to 48C and pre-warm the washing buffer. (prewarmed at 48C w/ some little mixing)
- Pellet the labeled bacteria (10,000xg, 5min at RT). Remove the supernatant carefully.
- Pallet still substantial (barely any change in size since last PBS washing)
- Resuspend the pellet with 500 uL washing buffer by repeat pipetting. Incubate the mixture at 48C for 20min without shaking.
- Had less than expected amount of W-buffer so added 500ul W-buffer into one tube then <500ul into the other tube
- Pellet the labeled bacteria (10,000xg, 5min at RT). Remove the supernatant.
- Additional washing with 500uL 1X PBS twice (10,000xg, 8min)
- After last wash, still substantial pallet so can still see it clearly in tube
- Resuspend the pellet with 100uL PBS and stored in 4C fridge
Results[edit]
Microscope Images[edit]
- ETOH MB PU (124/248)
- RLV MB PU (124/248)
Results based on microscope images show that RLV-fixed mouse bacteria showed slightly better fluorescence than ETOH-fixed
Flow Cytometry Results[edit]
- ETOH E. coli PN (used to calibrate flow cytometer PMT for ETOH E. coli)
- ETOH E. coli PU
- ETOH MB PN (used to calibrate flow cytometer PMT for ETOH MB)
- ETOH MB PU
- RLV MB PN (used to calibrate flow cytometer PMT for RLV MB)
- RLV MB PU
Overall Conclusions[edit]
- E. coli PU doesn't seem like it's working, but still move on because successful cultured mouse gut bacteria hybridization
- Based on both microscope and flow cytometry results, RLV-fixed MB has higher signal than ETOH-fixed MB