Noi/NOTES/2012-6-14: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>Noi No edit summary |
>Noi No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
'''Script''' | '''Script''' | ||
[[File:plot_LD1_status_PC1-4_p.015_v2_training.png| | [[File:plot_LD1_status_PC1-4_p.015_v2_training.png| 600px]] [[File:plot_LD1_status_PC1-4_p.015_v2_test.png| 600px]] |
Revision as of 20:20, 14 June 2012
Regression analysis of UCLA SZ data (disease status)
- From the comment on previous page
- LDA: random choose samples for training and (have UCLA-SZ and UCSD-GA on training and testing data sets)
- Training and testing data set (I used the same group of training and testing data as assigned for age analysis)
- list 1-96 =>UCSD-SZ, 97-169 => UCSD-GA
- trainAge <- c(1:40, 91:132)
- testAge <- c(41:90, 133:169)
- From the previous analysis, I used PC1-PC3 scores as input for LDA analysis. However when I plot scree plot of the variances contributed on each PC, the change in slope in the scree plot occurs at component 4. In this analysis, I'll put PC1-PC4 scores as input.
File:Screeplot status pval0.015.png Script File:Plot LD1 status PC1-4 p.015 v2 training.png File:Plot LD1 status PC1-4 p.015 v2 test.png