Daniel:Notebook/PosSequencing/2017-6-2: Difference between revisions

From ZhangLabWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
>Djacobse
>Djacobse
Line 84: Line 84:
Conclusions:
Conclusions:
*It didn't show well, but the H4 lane (dsDNA +++ control, dual primer) had a weird curve that started negative and went to zero quickly. It could have been poor baseline correction (platewise instead of by lane or something), in which case it actually CT'd 1st.
*It didn't show well, but the H4 lane (dsDNA +++ control, dual primer) had a weird curve that started negative and went to zero quickly. It could have been poor baseline correction (platewise instead of by lane or something), in which case it actually CT'd 1st.
*
*There is just too little sample left (if there is any at all) for detection. Even the dual primers never really amplified. I could modify the protocol to save more along the way, or test other methods


[[Category:PosSeq]] [[Category:20170531]]
[[Category:PosSeq]] [[Category:20170531]]

Revision as of 22:11, 2 June 2017

Emulsion PCR Test 3 (Started Wednesday)

Back to Calendar

Protocol-Part 2

  1. Single Primer qPCR
    1. Make the following master mixes
    2. Reagent uL in Single Rxn Master Mix P2 (5.2X) Master Mix BioU (5.2X) Master Mix Dual (5.2X)
      Primer 2 (10 uM) 1 5.2 0 5.2
      BioU Primer (10 uM) 1 0 5.2 5.2
      2X Kapa SYBR Master Mix 20 104 104 104
      nfH2O 17 88.4 88.4 83.2
      Total* (+ 2 uL sample=40) 38 197.6 197.6 197.6
    3. Aliquot 38 uL master mix to appropriate lanes
    4. Add 2 uL sample according to plate layout below
    5. File:PlateLayout-20170601-SPqPCR-emPCRTest3-Round2.png
    6. Run the following thermocycler program
      1. 95C 3 min
      2. 95C 3 sec
      3. 55C 30 sec
      4. 72C 20 sec
      5. plate read
      6. goto b x150
      7. 72C 2 min
      8. 16C hold

Results

Conclusions:

  • It didn't show well, but the H4 lane (dsDNA +++ control, dual primer) had a weird curve that started negative and went to zero quickly. It could have been poor baseline correction (platewise instead of by lane or something), in which case it actually CT'd 1st.
  • There is just too little sample left (if there is any at all) for detection. Even the dual primers never really amplified. I could modify the protocol to save more along the way, or test other methods