Daniel:Notebook/ComboLock/2016-12-9: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>Djacobse |
>Djacobse |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
When subjected to polymerization, if the latch is not present this yields a product that follows the backbone of the second C probe. See image below for clarification. | When subjected to polymerization, if the latch is not present this yields a product that follows the backbone of the second C probe. See image below for clarification. | ||
[[Image:C_Probes-BadCircularization.png| | [[Image:C_Probes-BadCircularization.png|400px|caption="C probes gap-filled when padlock binds (but not latch). C probes in red, padlock probe in green and polymerase-added bases in magenta. Vertical line indicates 5' end, arrow indicates 3' end."]] | ||
==Protocol== | ==Protocol== |
Revision as of 18:31, 9 December 2016
Lock Oligo Protocol
This protocol covers a new method using ideas taken from Weibrecht et al New Biotechnology 2012 (Landegren lab). The main idea I see is that they almost never use polymerase, but prefer to instead use ligation events as the predominant form. Based on the results from the extended latch experiment, the RCA-based cell test, and the sequencing from the first circularization test, it seems the probes do not circularize correctly. Note the original orientation of the C probes with the 5' end being the genome matching region and the 3' end being the latch/padlock adapter.
When subjected to polymerization, if the latch is not present this yields a product that follows the backbone of the second C probe. See image below for clarification.