Daniel:Notebook/HiResChrPaint/2013-8-5: Difference between revisions

From ZhangLabWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
>Djacobse
No edit summary
>Djacobse
No edit summary
Line 115: Line 115:
  5. Measure Concentration in Nanodrop
  5. Measure Concentration in Nanodrop
  6. Dry samples in vaccuum centrifuge
  6. Dry samples in vaccuum centrifuge
So I made a mistake in the column purification and forgot to '''SAVE THE FLOW THROUGH''' despite bold capitalized warnings.  I caught myself before messing up V6, but I lost V4.
===Nanodrop Results===
{| class="wikitable" <hiddentext>generated with [[:de:Wikipedia:Helferlein/VBA-Macro for EXCEL tableconversion]] V1.8</hiddentext>
|- style="font-size:12pt" align="center"
| align="center" width="65" height="15" | &nbsp;
|style="font-weight:bold" width="65" | ng/uL
|style="font-weight:bold" width="65" | ug in 20 uL
|- style="font-size:12pt" align="center"
|style="font-weight:bold" height="15" | V4S1
| align="center" | 362.2
| align="center" | 7.2
|}
So I have around 7 ug of DNA left in V6S1.

Revision as of 23:20, 5 August 2013

S1 Probe Preparation (Started 8/2/2013

Back to Calendar

Researched this morning on new ways to improve the FISH protocol. First of all, I noticed that in the supplementary material of Beliveau et al the images are not so crystal clear as the paper (go figure). From the supplements, I see that nucleii seem to have more background than I originally suspected (see thumbnail).

For a good image, the signal should be distinctly above background, but there will likely be background present in the nucleus. Second, also in the thumbnail, it looks like 42 C incubation will be better than 37C. Note that both images are from 16 hour incubation and human stained cells, just as I use. I also found more points, and I will summarize them all here:

  • Incubate at 42C instead of 37C; use water bath for this
  • Denature using the slide apparatus of the thermocycler we have in lab; can get to 92C easily and more even denaturing than water bath
  • Use human cot-1 DNA (at Dr. Zhang's request, would have done this for the last ones but we didn't have any)
  • Use fewer probes (10-20 pmole total). The previous FISH experiment used 20 pmol of each probe. Will hopefully reduce background to use less probe
  • Use a negative control; maybe hybridize with just the human cot-1 DNA (plus everything else in the hybridization cocktail except probe)

Lambda Exonuclease Digestion

1. Reaction Table
Sample V4S1A V4S1B V4S1C V4S1D V6S1A V6S1B V6S1C V6S1D
ng/uL 88.2 87.1 77.4 94.7 129.9 142.6 139.6 132.3
ug in 25 uL 2.2 2.2 1.9 2.4 3.2 3.6 3.5 3.3
uL added 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
uL 10x buffer 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
uL Lambda Exonuclease (5U/uL) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
uL nfH2O 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17
total 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
2. Incubate for 1 hour at 37C followed by 10 minute heat inactivation at 75C
3. Pool samples
4. ssDNA column purification, elute with 20 uL
5. Measure Concentration in Nanodrop
6. Dry samples in vaccuum centrifuge

So I made a mistake in the column purification and forgot to SAVE THE FLOW THROUGH despite bold capitalized warnings. I caught myself before messing up V6, but I lost V4.

Nanodrop Results

  ng/uL ug in 20 uL
V4S1 362.2 7.2

So I have around 7 ug of DNA left in V6S1.