Matt:LabNotes/2015-3-19
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
CA12k_Nov2014_V4 in vitro Capture Sequencing Analysis[edit]
- With in vitro Capture data, DARTFISH gene counts can be normalized and compared to other methods such as RNA-Seq
- For Regression Analysis with RNA-Seq, FISSEQ, and BeadArray (PGP1f) see: Matt:LabNotes/2015-4-8#Regression_Analysis
Mapping MiSeq reads to Oligo Sequences[edit]
Convert Probelist to Fasta File[edit]
CA12kNov2014_Probelist2Fasta.pl
bowtie2-build CA12k_Nov2014_V4_H1H2.fa CA12k_Nov2014_V4_H1H2
bowtie2 --phred33 -x CA12k_Nov2014_V4_H1H2 -q MC-20150121_CA12kNov2014_V4gDNA-1.R1.fastq > CA12kNov2014_V4gDNA_R1_H1H2.sam 2> CA12kNov2014_V4gDNA_stderr.txt & 2573875 reads; of these: 2573875 (100.00%) were unpaired; of these: 115745 (4.50%) aligned 0 times 2458058 (95.50%) aligned exactly 1 time 72 (0.00%) aligned >1 times 95.50% overall alignment rate bowtie2 --phred33 -x CA12k_Nov2014_V4_H1H2 -q MC-20150121_CA12kNov2014_V4cDNA-2.R1.fastq > CA12kNov2014_V4cDNA_R1_H1H2.sam 2> CA12kNov2014_V4cDNA_stderr.txt & 2425688 reads; of these: 2425688 (100.00%) were unpaired; of these: 110744 (4.57%) aligned 0 times 2314903 (95.43%) aligned exactly 1 time 41 (0.00%) aligned >1 times 95.43% overall alignment rate
samtools view -bS CA12kNov2014_V4gDNA_R1_H1H2.sam | samtools sort - CA12kNov2014_V4gDNA_R1_H1H2_sorted samtools view -h -F 4 CA12kNov2014_V4gDNA_R1_H1H2_sorted.bam > CA12kNov2014_V4gDNA_R1_H1H2_sorted_filtered.sam
samtools view -bS CA12kNov2014_V4cDNA_R1_H1H2.sam | samtools sort - CA12kNov2014_V4cDNA_R1_H1H2_sorted samtools view -h -F 4 CA12kNov2014_V4cDNA_R1_H1H2_sorted.bam > CA12kNov2014_V4cDNA_R1_H1H2_sorted_filtered.sam
Count # of Reads Aligned to each Probe[edit]
- Verified with grep -c 'Gene' CA12kNov2014_V4gDNA_R1_H1H2_sorted_filtered.sam and grep -c 'Probe' CA12kNov2014_V4gDNA_R1_H1H2_sorted_filtered.sam
- Differences in counts are accounted for by strings in header lines
Compare with Blue's BA8 bulk RNA-seq Gene Counts[edit]
RNA-Seq Data on Genome-miner[edit]
- mapped_genes.fpkm_tracking.txt
- /media/LTS_33T/RL_LTS33T/201404_201405_7Samples_BulkNucleiBatch1-20140623_Expt146/STAR/RL-BA8-sec9-n-N702-15May14_S2_mapped
- neuronal nuclei
- /media/LTS_33T/RL_LTS33T/201404_201405_7Samples_BulkNucleiBatch1-20140623_Expt146/STAR/RL-BA8-sec9-t-N701-15May14_S1_mapped
- bulk tissue
- /media/LTS_33T/RL_LTS33T/201404_201405_7Samples_BulkNucleiBatch1-20140623_Expt146/STAR/RL-BA8-sec9-n-N702-15May14_S2_mapped
Analysis in R[edit]
- Some R commands used
- Dropbox/GradZhangLab/CA12k_Nov2014/V4_CaptureAnalysis/V4CaptureAnalysis.RData
- All_GeneCounts is data.frame with all data
Results[edit]
- Since 66 (1.8%) probes have target regions that are highly repetitive (softmasked in reference genome; lowercase), they can have very high false in vitro capture counts and are removed from analysis
DARTFISH vs Sorted Neuronal Nuclei[edit]
- Regression of only genes where DARTFISH does not target masked regions <-----------> Including genes targeting masked regions
File:BA8 logDARTFISH vs logRNASeqBulkN masked regression.jpeg File:BA8 logDARTFISH vs logRNASeqBulkN regression.jpeg
DARTFISH vs Bulk Tissue[edit]
- Regression of only genes where DARTFISH does not target masked regions <-----------> Including genes targeting masked regions
File:BA8 logDARTFISH vs logRNASeqBulkT masked regression.jpeg File:BA8 logDARTFISH vs logRNASeqBulkT regression.jpeg
- Regression of only genes where DARTFISH does not target masked regions
- Excluded high and low expression genes based on RNA-Seq (-1 < log_FPKM < 8)
File:BA8 logDARTFISH vs logRNASeqBulkT masked medExpressGenes regression.jpeg
Conclusion[edit]
- in situ DARTFISH gene counts correlates better with bulk tissue RNA-Seq
- While removing genes with probes that target masked regions is conservative and certainly correct, it barely improves correlation with RNA-Seq
- Below are histograms of invitro gene counts, LEFT: all probes for gene considered, MIDDLE: only genes with no probes targeting masked region, RIGHT: partially masked - all 240 genes included but probes that target masked region not counted
File:Hist CA12kNov2014 V4 ReadsPerGene allprobes.jpeg File:Hist CA12kNov2014 V4 ReadsPerGene masked.jpeg File:Hist CA12kNov2014 V4 ReadsPerGene partmasked.jpeg
- Need to design 66 suppressor oligos to completely suppress (ordered probes flagged with a 1 in last column of file)
- Maybe only 12 probes with >1,000 count to suppress the probes that have astronomical in situ counts
- 18 probes with > 500, 22 probes with > 200, 32 probes with > 100
- Use histogram of reads per probe (with softmaskedprobes removed) to decide
- Maybe only 12 probes with >1,000 count to suppress the probes that have astronomical in situ counts
File:Hist CA12kNov2014 V4 ReadsPerProbe masked.jpeg File:Hist CA12kNov2014 V4 ReadsPerProbe maskedtargets.jpeg
- Ordered 39 probes
- 13 probes with >850 count
- 26 probes (with 50 < count < 850 and >~30% lowercase) + (probes with 11 < count < 50 and >~30% lowercase and show up in DARTFISH data)